linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] tty: serial: 8250

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:52:47 +0530
From:   Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
CC:     Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tty: serial: 8250_omap: Enable DMA support



On Thursday 19 January 2017 09:05 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:54:23AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> * Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> [170119 05:25]:
>>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 10:20:21AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> * Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com> [170113 00:03]:
>>>>> This patch series re enables DMA support for UART 8250_omap driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested on AM335x, AM437x that use EDMA and OMAP5 and DRA74 EVM with
>>>>> SDMA.
>>>>
>>>> Is 8250_omap serial console working for you on omap5 in general?
>>>>
>>>> I've noticed that it's really unresponsive for me as if the FIFO
>>>> interrupt was not working. For example logging in might take several
>>>> attempts and a long time with each character showing up much later
>>>> after some timeout.
>>>>
>>>> TX on the uart on omap5 seems to work OK, I do see all the console
>>>> messages fine. And these patches do not make the issue better or
>>>> worse.
>>>
>>> Ok, I'm dropping them from my review queue then.
>>
>> It turned out to be not related to this set of patches, Vignesh
>> posted a fix for it. For this set:
>>
>> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> 
> Ugh, these are now gone from my queue, can someone resend them with this
> acked-by added?
> 

I have resent this series with the Ack:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-serial&m=148490028003788&w=2

-- 
Regards
Vignesh