linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/13] Ingenic JZ4740 / JZ4780 pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaeu9OxaSPeOrkKtKNQGUQh4puCFw8A2h=xhqVdDWgoow@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 09:40:30 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Maarten ter Huurne <maarten@...ewalker.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MIPS <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Ingenic JZ4740 / JZ4780 pinctrl driver

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net> wrote:

> The problem with pinctrl and PWM, is that the pinctrl API works by "states".
> A default state, sleep state, and basically any custom state that the
> devicetree
> provides. This works well until you need to control individually each pin;
> with
> 8 pins, you would need 2^8 states, each one corresponding to a given
> configuration.

I do not really understand, do you really use all 2^8 states in a given
system?

The pin control states are to be used for practical situations, not
for all theoretical situations.

You should define in your device tree the states that your
particular system will use. Not all possible states on all possible
systems.

Yours,
Linus Walleij