[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170120101916.GF3824@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:19:16 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...eet.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] Input: pwm-beeper - add optional amplifier
regulator
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 02:40:56PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c b/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c
> index 9964c46468d3..7b213e0ab06c 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/pwm-beeper.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -25,30 +26,59 @@
> struct pwm_beeper {
> struct input_dev *input;
> struct pwm_device *pwm;
> + struct regulator *amplifier;
> struct work_struct work;
> unsigned long period;
> bool suspended;
> + bool amplifier_on;
Why do you need to track this? I thought regulator_enable() and
regulator_disable() were already reference counted?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists