[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d1fi1oo0.fsf@weeman.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 20:54:39 -0500
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@...vell.com>,
Joe Zhou <shjzhou@...vell.com>,
Jon Pannell <jpannell@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Don't forbid MDIO I/Os for PHY addr >= num_of_ports
Hi Andrew,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
>> Isn't there an hardware table used to map the PHY addresses on such chip?
>
> The 6390 has something like this. But if we can avoid it, lets keep it
> KISS.
I definitely agree. I was just curious about this new chip.
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists