linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] ARM: davinci: da850: model the SATA refclk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:55:44 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
Cc:     Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Patrick Titiano <ptitiano@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/14] ARM: davinci: da850: model the SATA refclk

2017-01-20 11:52 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>:
> On Thursday 19 January 2017 06:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Register a dummy clock modelling the external SATA oscillator for
>
> I had asked about this earlier. I dont think calling it a dummy clock is
> right. Can you fix it or respond to my earlier mail with any objections?
>

Sorry, I missed that - no objections against calling it a "fixed rate clock".

Thanks,
Bartosz