linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] power: reset: Add MAX77620 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170120124404.wmlpiuqyizi7uhyi@earth>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 13:44:04 +0100
From:   Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chaitanya Bandi <bandik@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: reset: Add MAX77620 support

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 03:29:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:00:36AM +0100, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> I actually have a set of patches somewhere which transforms the remaining
> direct users of arm_pm_restart to use the framework (unless I removed it
> from my trees - I don't really recall). I just never got around to submit
> it, and then [2] happened and I lost interest.

I found a patchset from you from 2016. I see a few Acks and no
negative feedback. Looks like they only need to be uploaded at
Russel's patch system?

arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c			https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844441/
arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c			https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844481/
drivers/firmware/psci.c				https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844411/
arch/arm/kernel/setup.c				https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844451/
removal of ARM64 arm_pm_restart		https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844471/
removal of ARM32 arm_pm_restart		https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8844391/

> > No such thing exists for poweroff. Guenter also wrote something for
> > that [1], but Linus intervened [2]. Anyways, pm_power_off is at
> > least architecture independent.
> > 
> That was by far the most frustrating kernel development experience
> I ever head :-(.

Sorry for the reminder.

-- Sebastian

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)