[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170121001233.6699f1b3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 00:12:33 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi tree with the tip tree
Hi Ingo,
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:35:52 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> I only had that patch for testing and it went into the -next branch by accident -
> I have removed it so the conflict should be gone next time -next is integrated.
Thanks, these things happen.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists