[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170120192724.GB84521@google.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 11:27:25 -0800
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] btmrvl: set irq_bt to -1 when failed to parse it
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 07:14:19PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> The irq_of_parse_and_map will return 0 as a invalid irq.
irq_of_parse_and_map() is weird to me. In general, Linux IRQ numbers
*can* be 0, but it looks like the OF framework understands that
device-tree based interrupts will not get mapped to a virtual IRQ number
of 0, so it's fine to use '0' as the error value?
In that case, I guess this is the most sensible solution...
> Set irq_bt to -1 in this case, so that the btmrvl resume/suspend code
> would not get confused.
More specifically: the suspend/resume code would have tried to
enable/disable IRQ 0.
> Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> ---
>
> drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c
> index c738bae..796f719 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static int btmrvl_sdio_probe_of(struct device *dev,
> cfg->irq_bt = irq_of_parse_and_map(card->plt_of_node, 0);
> if (!cfg->irq_bt) {
> dev_err(dev, "fail to parse irq_bt from device tree");
> + cfg->irq_bt = -1;
> } else {
> ret = devm_request_irq(dev, cfg->irq_bt,
> btmrvl_wake_irq_bt,
> --
> 2.1.4
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists