[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a319fba-f655-1025-5663-16d9d185e12f@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 15:02:01 -0500
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] jump_label: reduce the size of struct static_key
On 01/20/2017 02:19 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com> wrote:
>
>> struct static_key {
>> atomic_t enabled;
>> +/*
>> + * bit 0 => 1 if key is initially true
>> + * 0 if initially false
>> + * bit 1 => 1 if points to struct static_key_mod
>> + * 0 if points to struct jump_entry
>> + */
>> + union {
>> + unsigned long type;
>> + struct jump_entry *entries;
>> + struct static_key_mod *next;
>> + };
>
>
>> + key->type = (unsigned long)jlm2 | static_key_type(key);
>
>> + key->type = (unsigned long)jlm | static_key_type(key);
>
>> + *prev = (struct static_key_mod *)((unsigned long)jlm->next |
>> + ((unsigned long)*prev & JUMP_TYPE_MASK));
>
>> + key->type = (unsigned long)jlm->entries |
>> + static_key_type(key);
>
> I really hate these very ugly type conversions. Is there no cleaner way?
>
> For example the last line could sure be written as:
>
> key->entries = jlm->entries;
> key->type |= static_key_type(key);
>
> right?
Hi,
So that is going to over-write the static_key_type(key) in the first
assignment. If the order is reversed we can't just |= in the pointer type.
How about:
static void jump_key_set_entries(struct static_key *key, struct
jump_entry *entries)
{
unsigned long type;
type = static_key_type(key);
key->entries = entries;
key->type |= type;
}
and then we can also add:
void jump_key_set_mod(struct static_key *key, struct static_key_mod *mod)
doing basically the same thing. That will avoid the casts that you
called out.
better?
Thanks,
-Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists