[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN3PR03MB2227AD061609EB99B9632081CE710@BN3PR03MB2227.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 21:15:02 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
CC: "devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] hv: use substraction to update ring buffer index
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dexuan Cui
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 7:12 PM
> To: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>; KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>;
> Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] hv: use substraction to update ring buffer index
>
> > From: devel [mailto:driverdev-devel-bounces@...uxdriverproject.org] On
> > Behalf Of Long Li
> > Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 12:08
> > To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> > <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: devel@...uxdriverproject.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH] hv: use substraction to update ring buffer index
> >
> > From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> >
> > The ring buffer code uses %= to calculate index. For x86/64, %=
> > compiles to div, more than 10 times slower than sub.
> >
> > Replace div with sub for this data heavy code path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c | 9 ++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c index
> > cd49cb1..f8eee6e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hv/ring_buffer.c
> > @@ -135,7 +135,8 @@ hv_get_next_readlocation_withoffset(struct
> > hv_ring_buffer_info *ring_info,
> > u32 next = ring_info->ring_buffer->read_index;
> >
> > next += offset;
> > - next %= ring_info->ring_datasize;
> > + if (next >= ring_info->ring_datasize)
> > + next -= ring_info->ring_datasize;
> >
> > return next;
> > }
> > @@ -179,7 +180,8 @@ static u32 hv_copyfrom_ringbuffer(
> > memcpy(dest, ring_buffer + start_read_offset, destlen);
> >
> > start_read_offset += destlen;
> > - start_read_offset %= ring_buffer_size;
> > + if (start_read_offset >= ring_buffer_size)
> > + start_read_offset -= ring_buffer_size;
> >
> > return start_read_offset;
> > }
> > @@ -201,7 +203,8 @@ static u32 hv_copyto_ringbuffer(
> > memcpy(ring_buffer + start_write_offset, src, srclen);
> >
> > start_write_offset += srclen;
> > - start_write_offset %= ring_buffer_size;
> > + if (start_write_offset >= ring_buffer_size)
> > + start_write_offset -= ring_buffer_size;
> >
> > return start_write_offset;
> > }
>
> Hi Long,
> I guess you want to fix put_pkt_raw() too. :-)
Good point. I will send an updated patch.
>
> Thanks,
> -- Dexuan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists