lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 21 Jan 2017 00:29:31 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] serial: 8250_pci: remove exar code

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
>
> Remove the Exar specific codes from 8250_pci and blacklist those chips
> so that the new Exar serial driver binds to the devices.

> patch4? but those are from different vendor. They are with
> PCI_VENDOR_ID_COMMTECH. Then we should not name the file as 8250_exar.

But it seems it is using Exar behind the scenes. No?

> But if needed I can send a separate patch for that after this series is
> complete.

For me looks like logical continuation to this series. I'm fine with
separate patch later on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ