lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170121164909.nlwp4qh7ax3jj7zd@basecamp.onstation.org>
Date:   Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:49:09 -0500
From:   Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
To:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
        pmeerw@...erw.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ldewangan@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 15/15] staging: iio: isl29028: add runtime power
 management support

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 02:58:12PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 17/01/17 09:25, Brian Masney wrote:
> > This patch adds runtime power management support to the isl29028 driver.
> > It defaults to powering off the device after two seconds of inactivity.
> > 
> > isl29028_chip_init_and_power_on() currently only zeros the CONFIGURE
> > register on the chip, which will cause the chip to turn off. This patch
> > also renames that function to isl29028_clear_configure_reg() since it is
> > now used in several places.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> Whilst I'm not against it by an means, runtime PM is hardly a requirement
> for moving out of staging! Good stuff though so I'm not going to turn it
> down ;)

Thanks. I know it wasn't a requirement for a staging graduation but I
did it just for the fun of it to learn more about power management in
the kernel.

> I'm not 100% sure about the one comment I made at the end.
> It's a very unlikely to occur condition anyway, but if you want to follow up
> with a patch on that then feel free.

See below.

> Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for
> the autobuilders to play with it.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c
> > index 598a5a5..a3264f7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/isl29028.c
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> >  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> >  #include <linux/iio/sysfs.h>
> > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >  
> >  #define ISL29028_CONV_TIME_MS			100
> >  
> > @@ -60,6 +61,8 @@
> >  
> >  #define ISL29028_NUM_REGS			(ISL29028_REG_TEST2_MODE + 1)
> >  
> > +#define ISL29028_POWER_OFF_DELAY_MS		2000
> > +
> >  enum isl29028_als_ir_mode {
> >  	ISL29028_MODE_NONE = 0,
> >  	ISL29028_MODE_ALS,
> > @@ -297,6 +300,23 @@ static int isl29028_ir_get(struct isl29028_chip *chip, int *ir_data)
> >  	return isl29028_read_als_ir(chip, ir_data);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int isl29028_set_pm_runtime_busy(struct isl29028_chip *chip, bool on)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(chip->regmap);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (on) {
> > +		ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> > +			pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
> > +	} else {
> > +		pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev);
> > +		ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Channel IO */
> >  static int isl29028_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  			      struct iio_chan_spec const *chan,
> > @@ -304,9 +324,15 @@ static int isl29028_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  {
> >  	struct isl29028_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >  	struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(chip->regmap);
> > -	int ret = -EINVAL;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = isl29028_set_pm_runtime_busy(chip, true);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> > +
> > +	ret = -EINVAL;
> >  	switch (chan->type) {
> >  	case IIO_PROXIMITY:
> >  		if (mask != IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ) {
> > @@ -350,6 +376,13 @@ static int isl29028_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  
> >  	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> >  
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = isl29028_set_pm_runtime_busy(chip, false);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -359,9 +392,15 @@ static int isl29028_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  {
> >  	struct isl29028_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> >  	struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(chip->regmap);
> > -	int ret = -EINVAL;
> > +	int ret, pm_ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = isl29028_set_pm_runtime_busy(chip, true);
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> >  
> >  	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> > +
> > +	ret = -EINVAL;
> >  	switch (mask) {
> >  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> >  	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_PROCESSED:
> > @@ -405,6 +444,18 @@ static int isl29028_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> >  
> >  	mutex_unlock(&chip->lock);
> >  
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	/**
> > +	 * Preserve the ret variable if the call to
> > +	 * isl29028_set_pm_runtime_busy() is successful so the reading
> > +	 * (if applicable) is returned to user space.
> > +	 */
> > +	pm_ret = isl29028_set_pm_runtime_busy(chip, false);
> > +	if (pm_ret < 0)
> > +		return pm_ret;
> > +
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -445,17 +496,18 @@ static const struct iio_info isl29028_info = {
> >  	.write_raw = isl29028_write_raw,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static int isl29028_chip_init_and_power_on(struct isl29028_chip *chip)
> > +static int isl29028_clear_configure_reg(struct isl29028_chip *chip)
> >  {
> >  	struct device *dev = regmap_get_device(chip->regmap);
> >  	int ret;
> >  
> >  	ret = regmap_write(chip->regmap, ISL29028_REG_CONFIGURE, 0x0);
> > -	if (ret < 0) {
> > +	if (ret < 0)
> >  		dev_err(dev, "%s(): Error %d clearing the CONFIGURE register\n",
> >  			__func__, ret);
> > -		return ret;
> > -	}
> > +
> > +	chip->als_ir_mode = ISL29028_MODE_NONE;
> > +	chip->enable_prox = false;
> >  
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> > @@ -509,7 +561,6 @@ static int isl29028_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  	chip->enable_prox  = false;
> >  	chip->prox_sampling = 20;
> >  	chip->lux_scale = 2000;
> > -	chip->als_ir_mode = ISL29028_MODE_NONE;
> >  
> >  	ret = regmap_write(chip->regmap, ISL29028_REG_TEST1_MODE, 0x0);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> > @@ -527,7 +578,7 @@ static int isl29028_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	ret = isl29028_chip_init_and_power_on(chip);
> > +	ret = isl29028_clear_configure_reg(chip);
> >  	if (ret < 0)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > @@ -538,6 +589,11 @@ static int isl29028_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  	indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev;
> >  	indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> >  
> > +	pm_runtime_enable(&client->dev);
> > +	pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&client->dev,
> > +					 ISL29028_POWER_OFF_DELAY_MS);
> > +	pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&client->dev);
> > +
> >  	ret = devm_iio_device_register(indio_dev->dev.parent, indio_dev);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(&client->dev,
> > @@ -549,6 +605,50 @@ static int isl29028_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int isl29028_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
> > +	struct isl29028_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +
> > +	iio_device_unregister(indio_dev);
> > +
> > +	pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev);
> > +	pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev);
> > +	pm_runtime_put_noidle(&client->dev);
> > +
> > +	return isl29028_clear_configure_reg(chip);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __maybe_unused isl29028_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev));
> > +	struct isl29028_chip *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	mutex_lock(&chip->lock);
> > +
> > +	ret = isl29028_clear_configure_reg(chip);
> I'm stretching a bit, but there might be a race here.
> If we get a suspend and resume in under the time it takes for
> the auto suspend to conclude it is good to suspend, it might think
> the device is still ready to go when it isn't.

I don't believe that there is a race condition in that situation since
all of the i2c calls outside of the probe and remove functions come from
either isl29028_write_raw(), isl29028_read_raw(), or isl29028_suspend().
All of three of those functions lock a common mutex.

I just noticed that isl29028_remove() doesn't lock that shared mutex
when the device is removed and the chip is powered off. This is
unlikely to be an issue but I'll send a follow up patch in my next
series fixing that just to be sure.

Brian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ