lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170121002344.GM20800@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Jan 2017 16:23:44 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: bcm2835: Don't rate change PLLs on behalf of
 DSI PLL dividers.

On 01/18, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Our core PLLs are intended to be configured once and left alone.  With
> the SET_RATE_PARENT, asking to set the PLLD_DSI1 clock rate would
> change PLLD just to get closer to the requested DSI clock, thus
> changing PLLD_PER, the UART and ethernet PHY clock rates downstream of
> it, and breaking ethernet.
> 
> We *do* want PLLH to change so that PLLH_AUX can be exactly the value
> we want, though.  Thus, we need to have a per-divider policy of
> whether to pass rate changes up.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
> ---

Applied to clk-next

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ