[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5884846A.7040200@rock-chips.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:07:38 +0800
From: Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>
To: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>,
Mark Yao <mark.yao@...k-chips.com>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/26] drm/rockchip: dw-mipi-dsi: don't enable PHY PLL
until it's configured
Hi John
This patch do the similar thing with
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9530405/
They are changing the phy configuration order, my suggestion is to merge
them.
On 01/22/2017 12:31 AM, John Keeping wrote:
> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@...anate.com>
> ---
> Unchanged in v2
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> index ce1e6f9a2041..cfe7e4ba305c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> @@ -413,12 +413,12 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
>
> dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x44, HSFREQRANGE_SEL(testdin));
>
> - dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x19, PLL_LOOP_DIV_EN | PLL_INPUT_DIV_EN);
> dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x17, INPUT_DIVIDER(dsi->input_div));
> dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x18, LOOP_DIV_LOW_SEL(dsi->feedback_div) |
> LOW_PROGRAM_EN);
> dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x18, LOOP_DIV_HIGH_SEL(dsi->feedback_div) |
> HIGH_PROGRAM_EN);
> + dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x19, PLL_LOOP_DIV_EN | PLL_INPUT_DIV_EN);
>
> dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x22, LOW_PROGRAM_EN |
> BIASEXTR_SEL(BIASEXTR_127_7));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists