[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAbOScnzHaeyo1zNrNvtjSH1EqUEOnjQKE9LBfkWq+3DzxcqPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 01:37:43 -0600
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...omium.org>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] seccomp: dump core when using SECCOMP_RET_KILL
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 4:10 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2017, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Yup, I think this is fine. The additional kernel code executed before
> > the do_exit() is relatively limited, and is equivalent to leaving
> > kill(self, SIGSEGV) exposed in a seccomp filter. Setting an RLIMIT is
> > also sufficient to block the core generation, so really paranoid
> > environments can still do that.
> >
> > The forwarded ack stands:
> >
> > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> >
> > James, can you add this to your tree?
>
> Mike, please resend the patch, I don't have it.
looks like patchwork grabbed it:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9527359/
has a mbox link which should get you what you need ?
-mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists