lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1485168859.12563.29.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 02:54:19 -0800
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Make CodingStyle and SubmittingPatches symlinks

On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 11:44 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> When will/can we get rid of them?
> Old (doh) kernels, and new versions of stable kernels will keep on having
> them for the next +10 years.
> 
> To me, these[*] filenames are more like a user-visible API, which should
> not be changed without given consideration.

Yup.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ