linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Increase maximum micro-TLBS to 48

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXc6iMgnN9GCgu4DecX2HVbReu_4=cb+6_LMD39=DYnMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 13:42:15 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Simon Horman <horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Increase maximum micro-TLBS to 48

Hi Magnus,

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com> wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>
>
> Bump up the maximum numbers of micro-TLBS to 48.
>
> Each IPMMU device instance get micro-TLB assignment via
> the "iommus" property in DT. Older SoCs tend to use a
> maximum number of 32 micro-TLBs per IPMMU instance however
> newer SoCs such as r8a7796 make use of up to 48 micro-TLBs.
>
> At this point no SoC specific handling is done to validate
> the maximum number of micro-TLBs, and because of that the
> DT information is assumed to be within correct range for
> each particular SoC.
>
> If needed in the future SoC specific feature flags can be
> added to handle the maximum number of micro-TLBs without
> requiring DT changes, however at this point this does not
> seem necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>

Thanks for your patch!

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

> @@ -1141,7 +1145,7 @@ static int ipmmu_probe(struct platform_d
>         }
>
>         mmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
> -       mmu->num_utlbs = 32;
> +       mmu->num_utlbs = 48;

This value is only used to validate the utlb channel numbers received from DT,
in ipmmu_init_platform_device(), right?

>         spin_lock_init(&mmu->lock);
>         bitmap_zero(mmu->ctx, IPMMU_CTX_MAX);
>         mmu->features = match->data;

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds