lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:06:33 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <>,
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <>,
        LKML <>,
Subject: Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

On 23/01/2017 10:48, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> The others are useless churn or they make the result uselessly different
>> from the rest of KVM code.
> I got an other view about potential benefits around the suggested movements
> for error code settings.

I'll consider them when your emails stop looking like the output a
Markov chain.


> Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding run time changes
> a bit more?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists