linux-kernel - Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0fe83268-e233-557b-78b2-d34ff00a6ab3@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:06:33 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations



On 23/01/2017 10:48, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> The others are useless churn or they make the result uselessly different
>> from the rest of KVM code.
>
> I got an other view about potential benefits around the suggested movements
> for error code settings.

I'll consider them when your emails stop looking like the output a
Markov chain.

Paolo

> Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding run time changes
> a bit more?