linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170123141159.GE7836@lianli.shorne-pla.net>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 23:11:59 +0900
From:   Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
To:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, linux@...ck-us.net,
        fengguang.wu@...el.com
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 11:42:45AM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 12:39 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20170118:
> >
> > The audit tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> >
> > The tip tree gained a conflict against the security tree.
> >
> > The rcu tree gained a semantic conflict against the net-next tree for
> > which I applied a merge fix patch.
> >
> > I dropped 4 patches from the akpm tree that turned up in the tip tree.
> >
> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 3931
> >  4740 files changed, 146960 insertions(+), 87918 deletions(-)
> >
> 
> The or32 builds started failing in the last couple days:
> 
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12912013/
> 
> I was able to reproduce it locally, and a mindless bisect says:
> 
> 116ded1356614cff3facc9010125b5a28718cbf1 is the first bad commit
> commit 116ded1356614cff3facc9010125b5a28718cbf1
> Author: Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>
> Date:   Mon May 12 14:08:26 2014 +0300
> 
>     openrisc: add atomic bitops
> 
> I expect the binutils sfr is using is probably similar vintage to
> what I've got here locally - from kernel.org crosstool stuff:
> 
> $ or32-linux-as --version
> GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.20.1.20100303
> Copyright 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
> the GNU General Public License version 3 or later.
> This program has absolutely no warranty.
> This assembler was configured for a target of `or32-linux'.
> 

Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]?

If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up
a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test.

If there is something else that needs to be done let me know.

[0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git
[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/

-Stafford