linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X] for sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <5885778F.7010004@samsung.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:25:03 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
To:     myungjoo.ham@...sung.com,
        "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        "rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] PM / devfreq: Modify the device name as devfreq[X]
 for sysfs

On 2017년 01월 23일 11:19, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>>  	if (!dev || !profile || !governor_name) {
>> @@ -568,7 +569,8 @@ struct devfreq *devfreq_add_device(struct device *dev,
>>  		mutex_lock(&devfreq->lock);
>>  	}
>>  
>> -	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "%s", dev_name(dev));
>> +	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%lu",
>> +			(unsigned long)atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));
> 
> Do you have any specific reason to use "unsigned long" here?
> (atomic_t has 32bit int).

There is no any reason. I'll change to use the integer value as following:

	dev_set_name(&devfreq->dev, "devfreq%d", atomic_inc_return(&devfreq_no));


> 
>>  	err = device_register(&devfreq->dev);
>>  	if (err) {
>>  		mutex_unlock(&devfreq->lock);
>> -- 
>> 1.9.1


-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
S/W R&D Center
Samsung Electronics