[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170123165529.GA4996@test-lenovo>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 08:55:30 -0800
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, dvlasenk@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, haokexin@...il.com, hpa@...or.com,
quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Set the xcomp_bv when we fake up a
XSAVES area
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 07:36:20AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> The kernel xsave buffer should *ALWAYS* have the
> XCOMP_BV_COMPACTED_FORMAT bit set. It should have been set before the
> copyin and it should be set when it's finished.
>
> The best fix here would be not to paper over the issue in the copy
> function but find where it got clobbered, or where some initialization
> code failed to set it.
Someone else reported different issues from the same bug and a different
patch was just tested OK this morning. I think that adding xfeatures bits
to xcomp_bv should have been done in fpstate_init().
Also, in copy_init_fpstate_to_fpregs(), we do:
copy_kernel_to_xregs(&init_fpstate.xsave, -1).
That (-1) could mean (0) because the parameters are declared as:
copy_kernel_to_xregs(struct xregs_state *, u64)
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists