[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1793912.WfGyM7qEjy@diego>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 18:12:42 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
Huang Tao <huangtao@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] Implement clocksource for rockchip SoC using rockchip timer
Am Montag, 23. Januar 2017, 15:47:44 CET schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 05:21:05PM +0300, Alexander Kochetkov wrote:
> > Hello Heiko, Daniel!
> >
> > Are there any reasons why the patches [1][2] are not applied yet into
> > kernel? How can I help in applying patches?
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> sorry for the delay. Let me review them before taking the patchset.
>
> Heiko, can you have a look to them also ?
somehow this series moved down to much in my inbox, sorry.
Devicetree changes look good, except where I commented.
I guess it would be best (least intrusive) if I queue up the (then fixed)
devicetree changes after you are satisfied with the code parts.
I've also looked over the code changes again, test-build them and found the
build error mentioned separately. Overall they look good though.
Heiko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists