[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170123205725.GA3920@test-lenovo>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 12:57:25 -0800
From: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, dvlasenk@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brgerst@...il.com, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
jpoimboe@...hat.com, haokexin@...il.com, hpa@...or.com,
quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/fpu: Set the xcomp_bv when we fake up a
XSAVES area
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 09:23:06AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 01/23/2017 08:55 AM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> >> The best fix here would be not to paper over the issue in the copy
> >> function but find where it got clobbered, or where some initialization
> >> code failed to set it.
> >
> > Someone else reported different issues from the same bug and a different
> > patch was just tested OK this morning. I think that adding xfeatures bits
> > to xcomp_bv should have been done in fpstate_init().
>
> Right. So where did it get cleared out?
It is not set until a task triggers XSAVES. We did not set it in fpstate_init()
because there is no valid data at the time. The problem happens when Linux
copies data to the XSAVES area, like we see here; the kernel is not expected
to change XSAVES format (xcomp_bv) but xcomp_bv is still blank (except bit 63).
Because XSAVES format is not changed after boot time and xcomp_bv does not affect
INIT optimization, why don't we fix the problem in fpstate_init()?
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists