linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 052/130] powerpc/icp-opal: Fix missing KVM case and harden replay

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20170124075537.061337831@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 08:54:52 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 052/130] powerpc/icp-opal: Fix missing KVM case and harden replay

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>

commit 9728a7c8ab2f7a1c8d5c95278d2e4f4ac1285385 upstream.

The icp-opal call is missing the code from icp-native to recover
interrupts snatched by KVM. Without that, when running KVM, we can
get into a situation where an interrupt is lost and the CPU stuck
with an elevated CPPR.

Also harden replay by always checking the return from opal_int_eoi().

Fixes: d74361881f0d ("powerpc/xics: Add ICP OPAL backend")
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/icp-opal.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <asm/xics.h>
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/opal.h>
+#include <asm/kvm_ppc.h>
 
 static void icp_opal_teardown_cpu(void)
 {
@@ -39,7 +40,26 @@ static void icp_opal_flush_ipi(void)
 	 * Should we be flagging idle loop instead?
 	 * Or creating some task to be scheduled?
 	 */
-	opal_int_eoi((0x00 << 24) | XICS_IPI);
+	if (opal_int_eoi((0x00 << 24) | XICS_IPI) > 0)
+		force_external_irq_replay();
+}
+
+static unsigned int icp_opal_get_xirr(void)
+{
+	unsigned int kvm_xirr;
+	__be32 hw_xirr;
+	int64_t rc;
+
+	/* Handle an interrupt latched by KVM first */
+	kvm_xirr = kvmppc_get_xics_latch();
+	if (kvm_xirr)
+		return kvm_xirr;
+
+	/* Then ask OPAL */
+	rc = opal_int_get_xirr(&hw_xirr, false);
+	if (rc < 0)
+		return 0;
+	return be32_to_cpu(hw_xirr);
 }
 
 static unsigned int icp_opal_get_irq(void)
@@ -47,12 +67,8 @@ static unsigned int icp_opal_get_irq(voi
 	unsigned int xirr;
 	unsigned int vec;
 	unsigned int irq;
-	int64_t rc;
 
-	rc = opal_int_get_xirr(&xirr, false);
-	if (rc < 0)
-		return 0;
-	xirr = be32_to_cpu(xirr);
+	xirr = icp_opal_get_xirr();
 	vec = xirr & 0x00ffffff;
 	if (vec == XICS_IRQ_SPURIOUS)
 		return 0;
@@ -67,7 +83,8 @@ static unsigned int icp_opal_get_irq(voi
 	xics_mask_unknown_vec(vec);
 
 	/* We might learn about it later, so EOI it */
-	opal_int_eoi(xirr);
+	if (opal_int_eoi(xirr) > 0)
+		force_external_irq_replay();
 
 	return 0;
 }