[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6087342-f61f-0b4c-f67e-4239f861e974@mentor.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 17:45:59 -0800
From: Steve Longerbeam <steve_longerbeam@...tor.com>
To: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<shawnguo@...nel.org>, <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
<fabio.estevam@....com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<mchehab@...nel.org>, <hverkuil@...all.nl>, <nick@...anahar.org>,
<markus.heiser@...marIT.de>,
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>, <bparrot@...com>,
<geert@...ux-m68k.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>, <minghsiu.tsai@...iatek.com>,
<tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>, <jean-christophe.trotin@...com>,
<horms+renesas@...ge.net.au>,
<niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>, <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
<songjun.wu@...rochip.com>, <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/24] media: Add i.MX media core driver
On 01/23/2017 05:38 PM, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
>>
>>> Second, ignoring the above locking issue for a moment,
>>> v4l2_pipeline_pm_use()
>>> will call s_power on the sensor _first_, then the mipi csi-2 s_power,
>>> when executing
>>> media-ctl -l '"ov5640 1-003c":0 -> "imx6-mipi-csi2":0[1]'. Which is the
>>> wrong order.
>>> In my version which enforces the correct power on order, the mipi csi-2
>>> s_power
>>> is called first in that link setup, followed by the sensor.
>> I don't understand why you want to power up subdevs as soon as the links
>> are established.
>
> Because that is the precedence, all other media drivers do pipeline
> power on/off at link_notify. And v4l2_pipeline_link_notify() was written
> as a link_notify method.
>
>> Shouldn't that rather be done for all subdevices in the
>> pipeline when the corresponding capture device is opened?
>
> that won't work. There's no guarantee the links will be established
> at capture device open time.
ugh, maybe v4l2_pipeline_pm_use() would work at open/release. If there are
no links yet, it would basically be a no-op. And stream on requires
opening the
device, and the pipeline links should be established by then, so this
might be
fine, looking into this too.
Steve
>
>> It seems to me that powering up the pipeline should be the last step
>> before userspace actually starts the capture.
>
> Well, I'm ok with moving pipeline power on/off to start/stop streaming.
> I would actually prefer to do it then, I only chose at link_notify
> because
> of precedence. I'll look into it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists