linux-kernel - Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <15d06a81-28bf-7fd9-ce4b-d3d07383e8b4@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:36:39 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: KVM: Fine-tuning for several function implementations

>> Would others like to help in approaches for checking corresponding
>> run time changes a bit more?
> 
> You propose the patch

I suggested additional changes which can get an usual mixture of agreements
and rejections.


> and others should do the work to get it accepted?

Not directly. - I imagine that there are further collaboration possibilities,
aren't there?

Which benchmarks (and test metrics) would you trust for the desired software evolution?

Regards,
Markus