[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLZ-uAcDehoWb5ev9pHhkDy9XoEOyKQPg0qSUXw=dzOYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:53:34 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf: don't kfree an uninitialized im_node
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 6:16 AM, Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> There are some error exit paths to the label 'out' that end up
> kfree'ing an uninitialized im_node. Fix this by inititializing
> im_node to NULL to avoid kfree'ing a garbage address.
this fix already landed. See:
commit d140199af510 ("bpf, lpm: fix kfree of im_node in trie_update_elem")
> Issue found by CoverityScan, CID#1398022 ("Uninitialized pointer read")
Nice. Good to know that static analysis can do such checks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists