[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58879514.1020501@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 17:55:32 +0000
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>
CC: christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
lenb@...nel.org, matt@...eblueprint.co.uk, robert.moore@...el.com,
lv.zheng@...el.com, nkaje@...eaurora.org, zjzhang@...eaurora.org,
mark.rutland@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
eun.taik.lee@...sung.com, sandeepa.s.prabhu@...il.com,
labbott@...hat.com, shijie.huang@....com, rruigrok@...eaurora.org,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, tn@...ihalf.com, fu.wei@...aro.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bristot@...hat.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, Suzuki.Poulose@....com, punit.agrawal@....com,
astone@...hat.com, harba@...eaurora.org, hanjun.guo@...aro.org,
john.garry@...wei.com, shiju.jose@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for
ARMv8
Hi Tyler,
On 20/01/17 20:58, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 1/19/2017 10:57 AM, James Morse wrote:
>> On 18/01/17 23:51, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
>>> On 1/18/2017 7:50 AM, James Morse wrote:
>>>> On 12/01/17 18:15, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> There are two other things that need changing to make the in_nmi() code path
>> work on arm64.
>> Always reserve the virtual-address-space forcing GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES to be 2
>> regardless of CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI. This is almost revert of
>> 594c7255dce7a13cac50cf2470cc56e2c3b0494e (but that did a few other things too).
> Looks simple enough, should I force it to 2 in all cases, or add a check for
> CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
> similar to the check for CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI?
Its just address space not actual memory it is reserving right? I think just
reserve two pages all the time to save eye-sore #ifdefs!
>> We also need to fix ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() to use arch_apei_get_mem_attribute()
>> and not assume PAGE_KERNEL.
> So just change the call to ioremap_page_range to:
>
> ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE, pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> arch_apei_get_mem_attribute());
(you need to give arch_apei_get_mem_attribute() the address...) copying whatever
ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq() does a few lines down is probably best.
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists