[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1485294689-11485-4-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 13:51:15 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com,
bobby.prani@...il.com, Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 04/18] rcu: Only dump stalled-tasks stacks if there was a real stall
From: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
The print_other_cpu_stall() function currently unconditionally invokes
rcu_print_detail_task_stall(). This is OK because if there was a stall
sufficient to cause print_other_cpu_stall() to be invoked, that stall
is very likely to persist through the entire print_other_cpu_stall()
execution. However, if the stall did not persist, the variable ndetected
will be zero, and that variable is already tested in an "if" statement.
Therefore, this commit moves the call to rcu_print_detail_task_stall()
under that pre-existing "if" to improve readability, with a very rare
reduction in overhead.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>
[ paulmck: Reworked commit log. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index cb4e2056ccf3..6232d2f9a84e 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1379,6 +1379,9 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gpnum)
(long)rsp->gpnum, (long)rsp->completed, totqlen);
if (ndetected) {
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks(rsp);
+
+ /* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
+ rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
} else {
if (READ_ONCE(rsp->gpnum) != gpnum ||
READ_ONCE(rsp->completed) == gpnum) {
@@ -1395,9 +1398,6 @@ static void print_other_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, unsigned long gpnum)
}
}
- /* Complain about tasks blocking the grace period. */
- rcu_print_detail_task_stall(rsp);
-
rcu_check_gp_kthread_starvation(rsp);
panic_on_rcu_stall();
--
2.5.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists