lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvwJrLR8-5QSfzL3TBk_kwLSUq+DarCB5XWbn+LKiK53dQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Jan 2017 23:20:39 +0100
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com>
Cc:     "dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fs/jffs2/readinode.c:189: faulty logic ?

David,

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 9:15 AM, David Binderman <dcb314@...mail.com> wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> fs/jffs2/readinode.c:189]: (style) Condition 'tn.fn.ofs>=offset' is always true

What tool produces this info?

> Source code is
>
>         if (tn->fn->ofs < offset)
>             next = tn->rb.rb_right;
>         else if (tn->fn->ofs >= offset)
>             next = tn->rb.rb_left;
>         else
>             break;
>
> Maybe better code
>
>         if (tn->fn->ofs < offset)
>             next = tn->rb.rb_right;
>         else if (tn->fn->ofs > offset)
>             next = tn->rb.rb_left;
>         else
>             break;

That code is odd, yes. But we need more info.
Why is fn.fn.ofs>=offset always true?
AFAICT tn->fn->ofs > offset can be also true but
else break is never reached.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ