linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for ethernet switch 88E6341

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8760l3375t.fsf@free-electrons.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:55:42 +0100
From:   Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
        Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
        Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@...vell.com>,
        Joe Zhou <shjzhou@...vell.com>,
        Jon Pannell <jpannell@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add support for ethernet switch 88E6341

Hi Andrew,
 
 On mer., janv. 25 2017, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

>> +	[MV88E6341] = {
>> +		.prod_num = PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_NUM_6341,
>> +		.family = MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341,
>> +		.name = "Marvell 88E6341",
>> +		.num_databases = 4096,
>> +		.num_ports = 6,
>> +		.port_base_addr = 0x10,
>> +		.global1_addr = 0x1b,
>> +		.age_time_coeff = 15000,
>
> Hi Gregory
>
> Please could you check this timer in the datasheet. There is currently
> a bug in the mv88e6390 support code. I also set it to 15s. But in fact
> it is 3.75 seconds. The 6341 might also use 3.75 seconds.

When I read your series I also thought about it and indeed it is 3.75
seconds. I will fix it.

Thanks,

Gregory


>
>    Thanks
> 	Andrew

-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com