[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170125091034.2cwnq7g72fndhuqz@lukather>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 10:10:34 +0100
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/13] mmc: sunxi: Always set signal delay to 0 for A64
Hi Ulf,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:16:12AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 16 January 2017 at 17:56, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Experience have shown that the using the autocalibration could severely
> > degrade the performances of the MMC bus.
> >
> > Allwinner is using in its BSP a delay set to 0 for all the modes but HS400.
> > Remove the calibration code for now, and add comments to document our
> > findings.
>
> So doesn't this break some platforms using HS400? Or are you saying
> those are already broken?
Like Andre said, HS400 isn't supported at all, so there's no
regression or brokenness involved :)
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists