linux-kernel - Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: STiH407-family: Enable HW flow-control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170125114002.GG5680@griffinp-ThinkPad-X1-Carbon-2nd>
Date:   Wed, 25 Jan 2017 11:40:02 +0000
From:   Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...inux.com
Subject: Re: [STLinux Kernel] [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: STiH407-family: Enable HW
 flow-control

On Wed, 25 Jan 2017, Peter Griffin wrote:

> Hi Lee,
> 
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2017, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> > Hardware flow-control capability must be specified at a platform
> > level in order to inform the ASC driver that the platform is capable
> > (i.e. are the lines wired up, etc).  STiH4{07,10} devices are indeed
> > capable, so let's provide the property.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > index 9789978..7ada8ea 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stih407-family.dtsi
> > @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@
> >  			pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_serial0_flowctrl>;
> >  			pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_serial0>;
> >  			clocks = <&clk_s_c0_flexgen CLK_EXT2F_A9>;
> > -
> > +			st,hw-flow-control;
> 
> There is a generic serial binding for this already. As this ST property
> hasn't been used upstream, it seems like it would be worth dropping it
> and switching to the generic uart-has-rtscts one.
> 
> See Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/serial.txt
> 
>   - uart-has-rtscts: The presence of this property indicates that the
>     UART has dedicated lines for RTS/CTS hardware flow control, and that
>     they are available for use (wired and enabled by pinmux configuration).
>     This depends on both the UART hardware and the board wiring.
>     Note that this property is mutually-exclusive with "cts-gpios" and
>     "rts-gpios" above.

Thinking some more this generic binding definition is a bit restrictive,
particularly the "Note that this property is mutually-exclusive with "cts-gpios"
and "rts-gpios"" part.

As with this series we will have dynamic on-the-fly changing from hw flow
control to gpio control for other configs which the HW IP doesn't support.

IMO the uart-has-rtscts definition should be updated to reflect that they can
be used together in certain circumstances.

regards,

Peter.