[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1485361713.2133.327.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:28:33 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [char-misc-next V2] mei: simplify error handling via devres
function.
On Wed, 2017-01-25 at 18:25 +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> Use devm_ and pcim_ functions to make error handling
> simpler and code smaller and tidier.
>
> Based on original patch by
> mei: me: use managed functions pcim_* and devm_*
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/1/339
>
Thanks for an update!
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
One nitpick below and please use my SoB instead of Cc here. And you may
remove my name above in the commit message (You might leave a link if
you want to)
> 2. Revert pcim irq reservation change.
Noticed that in my origin patch it wasn't touched.
> disable_msi:
> pci_disable_msi(pdev);
But this one in error path of ->probe() and below in ->remove() can be
removed. pcim_release() will take care of it. (request_threaded_irq()
and free_irq() must be left untouched, indeed)
In suspend/resume you would use it if you want to, though I don't know
if it makes any difference.
> free_irq(pdev->irq, dev);
> pci_disable_msi(pdev);
Ditto for the second module, pci_disable_msi() can be safely removed.
(System sleep case is a separate one and perhaps needs additional
testing, thus, up to you)
> release_irq:
> free_irq(pdev->irq, dev);
> pci_disable_msi(pdev);
> free_irq(pdev->irq, dev);
> pci_disable_msi(pdev);
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists