[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170125182955.uznr5ehpx4dabcon@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:29:55 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@...omium.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Sathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@...el.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Aaron Durbin <adurbin@...omium.org>, dlaurie@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Implement generic regulator constraints parsing for
ACPI and OF
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 06:23:20PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:56:42AM -0800, Furquan Shaikh wrote:
> > That is the reason why the recent change to add ACPI support to fixed
> > regulators was done
> > (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/regulator/fixed.c#L100).
> To be honest, I'm surprised this got merged.
My understanding was that it was instantiated from another device as an
implementation detail of that device, letting it say "this GPIO should
be handled as a regulator".
> Mark, this was added in this cycle; can we please rip that out for now?
If it's instantiated directly we probably should.
> We can certainly come up with something that allows drivers to support
> both, but trying to do this without updating drivers opens a huge set of
> problems.
I think there's a reasonable chance that any ACPI specs could be written
in such a way as to allow transparent support in Linux, the main thing
I'd worry about is naming issues.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists