[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170125212409.GC5496@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 22:24:09 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>, julia.lawall@...6.fr,
maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, wens@...e.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: musb: constify musb_hdrc_config structures
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:58:15AM -0600, Bin Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:52:22AM +0530, Bhumika Goyal wrote:
> > Declare musb_hdrc_config structures as const as they are only stored in
> > the config field of a musb_hdrc_platform_data structure. This field is of
> > type const, so musb_hdrc_config structures having this property can be
> > made const too.
> > Done using Coccinelle:
> >
> > @r disable optional_qualifier@
> > identifier x;
> > position p;
> > @@
> > static struct musb_hdrc_config x@......};
> >
> > @ok@
> > struct musb_hdrc_platform_data pdata;
> > identifier r.x;
> > position p;
> > @@
> > pdata.config=&x@p;
> >
> > @bad@
> > position p != {r.p,ok.p};
> > identifier r.x;
> > @@
> > x@p
> >
> > @depends on !bad disable optional_qualifier@
> > identifier r.x;
> > @@
> > +const
> > struct musb_hdrc_config x;
> >
> > File size before:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 1212 338 0 1550 60e drivers/usb/musb/jz4740.o
> >
> > File size after:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 1268 290 0 1558 616 drivers/usb/musb/jz4740.o
> >
> > File size before:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 6151 333 16 6500 1964 drivers/usb/musb/sunxi.o
> >
> > File size after:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 6215 269 16 6500 1964 drivers/usb/musb/sunxi.o
> >
> > File size before:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 3668 864 0 4532 11b4 drivers/usb/musb/ux500.o
> >
> > File size after:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 3724 808 0 4532 11b4 drivers/usb/musb/ux500.o
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> Why you don't want this patch go through my tree? Now it causes me tree
> rebase failed. It should be easy to fix, but just wanted to learn your
> rules.
What are you rebasing? And why? Just send me patches, I can merge them
when they come in just fine.
Normally yes, I do wait for these to go through your tree, but it was
just so simple, and obvious, and in a bunch of others from the author,
that I figured I could just take it as-is.
sorry if it caused you problems, but you might want to look at your
development process if it is. You should always be able to handle other
people changing files in your area at any point in time. Kernel
maintainership is not "no one else can ever touch this!" type of
development, you have to be able to handle stuff like this easily.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists