[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170126092911.GF17297@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:29:11 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:05:06AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Mika and all,
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 18:16:51 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 04:26:08PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > > The pinctrl-baytrail driver builds just fine as a module so give
> > > users this option.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
> > > Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > Assuming you have checked that nothing breaks in Baytrail, I'm fine with
> > this change,
>
> I have not, as I do not have access to any Baytrail hardware. This is
> the very reason why I'd like this code to be buildable as a module: I'm
> not happy with a useless 50 kB driver being loaded on all my systems. I
> was hopping someone at Intel would have access to the hardware to
> perform the test.
We do not have all the possible hardware here. I have one Minnowboard
MAX which I can test this on (like I commented in the other email) but
it does not have any ACPI GPIO OpRegion stuff that is present in many
Baytrail based laptops out there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists