[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170126100804.zrkkmghgzg2pzrtz@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 10:08:04 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] mm: vmscan: only write dirty pages that the scanner
has seen twice
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 01:16:40PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Dirty pages can easily reach the end of the LRU while there are still
> clean pages to reclaim around. Don't let kswapd write them back just
> because there are a lot of them. It costs more CPU to find the clean
> pages, but that's almost certainly better than to disrupt writeback
> from the flushers with LRU-order single-page writes from reclaim. And
> the flushers have been woken up by that point, so we spend IO capacity
> on flushing and CPU capacity on finding the clean cache.
>
> Only start writing dirty pages if they have cycled around the LRU
> twice now and STILL haven't been queued on the IO device. It's
> possible that the dirty pages are so sparsely distributed across
> different bdis, inodes, memory cgroups, that the flushers take forever
> to get to the ones we want reclaimed. Once we see them twice on the
> LRU, we know that's the quicker way to find them, so do LRU writeback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists