[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN3PR07MB25160FCBCF19918C495F43B4C9770@BN3PR07MB2516.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:15:58 +0000
From: Rafal Ozieblo <rafalo@...ence.com>
To: Andrei Pistirica <andrei.pistirica@...rochip.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"nicolas.ferre@...el.com" <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
"harinikatakamlinux@...il.com" <harinikatakamlinux@...il.com>,
"harini.katakam@...inx.com" <harini.katakam@...inx.com>
CC: "punnaia@...inx.com" <punnaia@...inx.com>,
"michals@...inx.com" <michals@...inx.com>,
"anirudh@...inx.com" <anirudh@...inx.com>,
"boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com"
<boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com"
<alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
"tbultel@...elsurmer.com" <tbultel@...elsurmer.com>,
"richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2] macb: Common code to enable ptp support for
MACB/GEM
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrei Pistirica [mailto:andrei.pistirica@...rochip.com]
> Sent: 19 stycznia 2017 16:56
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] macb: Common code to enable ptp support for MACB/GEM
>
>
> +static inline bool gem_has_ptp(struct macb *bp)
> +{
> + return !!(bp->caps & MACB_CAPS_GEM_HAS_PTP);
> +}
Why don't you use hardware capabilities here? Would it be better to read it from hardware instead adding it to many configuration?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists