[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE_wzQ_kC4nc28VU-msZkMAnChtkY6uWiSWFv8x4BHh3B7RJXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 08:42:20 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
To: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>, drinkcat@...omium.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"open list:SPI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: mediatek: Only do dma for 4-byte aligned buffers
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org> wrote:
> Mediatek SPI DMA only works when tx and rx buffer addresses are 4-byte
> aligned.
>
> Unaligned DMA transactions appeared to work previously, since we the
> spi core was incorrectly using the spi_master device for dma, which
> had a 0 dma_mask, and therefore the swiotlb dma map operations were
> falling back to using bounce buffers. Since each DMA transaction would
> use its own buffer, the mapped starting address of each transaction was
> always aligned. When doing real DMA, the mapped address will share the
> alignment of the raw tx/rx buffer provided by the SPI user, which may or
> may not be aligned.
>
> If a buffer is not aligned, we cannot use DMA, and must use FIFO based
> transaction instead.
>From spi.h:
/**
* struct spi_transfer - a read/write buffer pair
* @tx_buf: data to be written (dma-safe memory), or NULL
* @rx_buf: data to be read (dma-safe memory), or NULL
DMA-safe memory is ___cacheline_aligned, so it appears to be user (of
the SPI) error providing "bad" memory for transfers.
Thanks,
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists