linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iJbH+BTV+PEi6wGcd_aT_5SKpgkc7BdQxwat-BNdE54A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 00:44:30 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface"

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 1:31 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:56:07AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> Did it actually go to linux-acpi, BTW?
>
> Don't think so.

Well, that may be why it wasn't caught, then.

It generally is a good idea to request patch submitters to CC all
ACPI-related changes to that list just in case. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael