linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to tristate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170127095553.02cbd9ad@endymion>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:55:53 +0100
From:   Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] pinctrl: intel: Turn Baytrail support to
 tristate

On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:29:11 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:05:06AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > I have not, as I do not have access to any Baytrail hardware. This is
> > the very reason why I'd like this code to be buildable as a module: I'm
> > not happy with a useless 50 kB driver being loaded on all my systems. I
> > was hopping someone at Intel would have access to the hardware to
> > perform the test.
> 
> We do not have all the possible hardware here. I have one Minnowboard
> MAX which I can test this on (like I commented in the other email) but
> it does not have any ACPI GPIO OpRegion stuff that is present in many
> Baytrail based laptops out there.

Takashi, do you have any such laptop or know anyone at SUSE who does
and could test?

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support