[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1485513061.19754.62.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 11:31:01 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
"maintainer:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..."
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] mmc: bcm2835: add bcm2835_check_data_error
Hi,
> > @@ -1007,15 +1017,7 @@ static void bcm2835_data_irq(struct bcm2835_host *host, u32 intmask)
> > if (!host->data)
> > return;
> >
>
> remove this check, !host->data, as well.
There is a comment in the code saying it is needed, here is more
context:
static void bcm2835_data_irq(struct bcm2835_host *host, u32 intmask)
{
/* There are no dedicated data/space available interrupt
* status bits, so it is necessary to use the single shared
* data/space available FIFO status bits. It is therefore not
* an error to get here when there is no data transfer in
* progress.
*/
if (!host->data)
return;
bcm2835_check_data_error(host, intmask);
cheers,
Gerd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists