[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu9C75q3J_8w68d+m=ZMcUh2MxU+c-1xvLwyY+mceSigbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:03:36 +0000
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Nicolai Stange <nicstange@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/4] efi/x86: move efi bgrt init code to early init
On 16 January 2017 at 02:45, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here the the update of the series for moving bgrt init code to early init.
>
> Main changes is:
> - Move the 1st patch to the last because it does not block the 2nd patch
> any more with Peter's patch to prune invlid memmap entries:
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/efi/efi.git/commit/?h=next&id=b2a91
> a35445229
> But it is still tood to have since efi_mem_reserve only cares about boot related
> mem ranges.
>
> - Other comments about code itself, details please the the patches themselves.
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/efi.h | 1
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 12 +++++++
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi-bgrt.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 26 +++--------------
> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 2 -
> drivers/acpi/bgrt.c | 28 +++++++++++++-----
> drivers/firmware/efi/fake_mem.c | 3 +
> drivers/firmware/efi/memmap.c | 22 +++++++++++++-
> include/linux/efi-bgrt.h | 7 +---
> include/linux/efi.h | 5 +--
> init/main.c | 1
> 11 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
>
Dave,
I have pushed these to efi/next: please double check if I did it
correctly. I had some trouble applying these given that I rebased
efi/next onto -rc4. However, the fact that you are not using standard
git cover letters and emails doesn't help things, so could you
*please* use standard git send-email to post to linux-efi in the
future? Thanks.
Ard.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists