linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20170127180203.eacwbyb2noqjpmgw@kozik-lap>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 20:02:03 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/8] pinctrl: samsung: Add support for pad retention
 control for Exynos5433 SoCs

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:48:11PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:33:49AM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > This patch adds support for retention control for Exynos5433 SoCs. Three
> > groups of pins has been defined for retention control: common shared group
> > for ALIVE, CPIF, eSE, FINGER, IMEM, NFC, PERIC, TOUCH pin banks and
> > separate control for FSYS and AUD pin banks, for which PMU retention
> > registers match whole banks.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c    | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h | 16 ++++++++

I already have some non-conflicting changes to exynos-regs-pmu.h in my
branch. Now I want to add some more which will create conflicts.

How about splitting the header to separate patch, so I will take it to
my exynos-pmu branch?

Best regards,
Krzysztof