linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] base/memory, hotplug: fix a kernel oops in show_valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1485542594.2029.30.camel@hpe.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:47:49 +0000
From:   "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
To:     "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "zhenzhang.zhang@...wei.com" <zhenzhang.zhang@...wei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <arbab@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "abanman@....com" <abanman@....com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] base/memory, hotplug: fix a kernel oops in
 show_valid_zones()

On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 08:48 +0100, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:26:23PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-01-26 at 13:52 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 14:44:15 -0700 Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Reading a sysfs memoryN/valid_zones file leads to the following
> > > > oops when the first page of a range is not backed by struct
> > > > page. show_valid_zones() assumes that 'start_pfn' is always
> > > > valid for page_zone().
> > > > 
> > > >  BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
> > > > ffffea017a000000
> > > >  IP: show_valid_zones+0x6f/0x160
> > > > 
> > > > Since test_pages_in_a_zone() already checks holes, extend this
> > > > function to return 'valid_start' and 'valid_end' for a given
> > > > range. show_valid_zones() then proceeds with the valid range.
> > > 
> > > This doesn't apply to current mainline due to changes in
> > > zone_can_shift().  Please redo and resend.
> > 
> > Sorry, I will rebase to the -mm tree and resend the patches.
> > 
> > > Please also update the changelog to provide sufficient
> > > information for others to decide which kernel(s) need the
> > > fix.  In particular: under what circumstances will it occur?  On
> > > real machines which real people own?
> > 
> > Yes, this issue happens on real x86 machines with 64GiB or more
> > memory.  On such systems, the memory block size is bumped up to
> > 2GiB. [1]
> > 
> > Here is an example system.  0x3240000000 is only aligned by 1GiB
> > and its memory block starts from 0x3200000000, which is not backed
> > by struct page.
> > 
> >  BIOS-e820: [mem 0x0000003240000000-0x000000603fffffff] usable
> > 
> > I will add the descriptions to the patch.
> 
> Should it also be backported to the stable kernels to resolve the
> issue there?

Yes, it should be backported to the stable kernels.  The memory block
size change was made by commit bdee237c034, which was accepted to 3.9. 
However, this patch-set depends on (and fixes) the change to
test_pages_in_a_zone() made by commit 5f0f2887f4, which was accepted to
4.4.  So, in the current form, I'd recommend we backport it up to 4.4.

Thanks,
-Toshi