[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20170127184745.GD8801@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:47:45 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Chris Brand <chris.brand@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Kalyan Kinthada <kalyan.kinthada@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs
On 01/27, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On ven., janv. 27 2017, Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz> wrote:
>
> > The 98DX3236, 98DX3336 and 98DX4251 are a set of switch ASICs with
> > integrated CPUs. They CPU block is common within these product lines and
> > (as far as I can tell/have been told) is based on the Armada XP. There
> > are a few differences due to the fact they have to squeeze the CPU into
> > the same package as the switch.
> >
> > I've rebased this series against linux-pinctrl/devel to get access to
> > mvebu_mmio_mpp_ctrl. Everything else still applies cleanly to
> > v4.10.0-rc5.
>
> Just to let you know that I plan to apply the 3 arm patch once Chris
> will have sent the new series with the minor fixes I asked on patch 3.
>
> I already applied them in the for-next branch to benefit of some build
> test coverage.
>
> Stephen,
>
> you gave your Acked-by on the first patch, but don't you plan to apply
> it on the clk branch?
It must have not been clear if I should apply it, hence the ack.
I'll apply it now.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists