linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: srp_transport: Fix 'always false comparison' in srp_tmo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1485546128.4267.25.camel@sandisk.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:42:28 +0000
From:   Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To:     "augustocaringi@...il.com" <augustocaringi@...il.com>
CC:     "jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "emilne@...hat.com" <emilne@...hat.com>,
        "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" 
        <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: srp_transport: Fix 'always false comparison' in
 srp_tmo_valid()

On Fri, 2017-01-27 at 10:06 +0000, Augusto Mecking Caringi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Bart Van Assche
> <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com> wrote:
> > This patch is wrong. The purpose of the dev_loss_tmo >= LONG_MAX / HZ check
> > is to avoid that the expression 1UL * dev_loss_tmo * HZ further down
> > overflows. Can you check whether changing the if-statement into if (1UL *
> > dev_loss_tmo >= LONG_MAX / HZ) also suppresses the compiler warning?
> 
> Hi Bart,
> 
>     Right, now a I see...
> 
>     Doing your proposed change the warning go away...
> 
>     Do you want me to send a new patch for that?

Hello Augusto,

If you want your patch to go upstream you will have to repost it.

Bart.