linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5fe40284-dd72-7952-47a6-b5ebc375f8a1@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:18:30 -0600
From:   Douglas Miller <dougmill@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        Guilherme Piccoli <gpiccoli@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during
 percpu-atomic transition

I will re-test and post the patch using "bool" when finished.

On 01/27/2017 06:13 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 05:32:15PM -0600, Douglas Miller wrote:
>> Removed extraneous parentheses. Did not switch to "bool" as that would necessitate
>> more testing and raises the question whether other platforms might have a different
>> definition for "bool" that would not fix this problem.
> Please switch to bool.
>
> Thanks.
>