[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeZ13zeEL_pG6CGnD9Tzi0aGDwHvFdTEU8p0AsC1x1hdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2017 15:32:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-sgx-kernel-dev@...ts.01.org,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Get rid of BUG()
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> The use of BUG() is not favored for any new kernel code. This patch set
> implements more reasonable error recovery. In all cases the recovery is not
> ideal but it is an improvement to the current situation.
>
> In addition, sgx_free_page() has been simplified by removing the parameter for
> skipping EREMOVE. EREMOVE can be successfully executed for an unused EPC page.
>
> Jarkko Sakkinen (3):
By some reason I only see first patch.
What's going on?
> intel_sgx: do not use BUG() in sgx_free_page()
> intel_sgx: remove flags parameter from sgx_free_page()
> intel_sgx: fix error paths for EBLOCK and ETRACK
>
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx.h | 4 +-
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_ioctl.c | 12 ++--
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_page_cache.c | 89 +++++++++++++++--------------
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_util.c | 6 +-
> drivers/platform/x86/intel_sgx_vma.c | 6 +-
> 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.9.3
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists